We use cookies to personalize content and ads, provide social media features, and analyze traffic. In addition, we provide social media, advertising, and analytics partners with information about how you use our website. If you continue to use our website, you agree to our cookies.

P6FourSeason tyre reviews

We gathered since 1999 tyre reviews - we have more than 400,000 test results
and more than 5 billion driven kilometers. Find the best tyre for you.

To the shop categories: All-season Tyres

P6FourSeason tyre review

Grip in dry conditions

Braking in dry conditions

Grip in wet conditions

Braking in wet conditions

Grip in snow

Driving comfort

Internal noise level

Tyre wear

Fuel consumption

Average based on 12 test results
Ø 4,885,488 km driven

Score

Buy and information P6FourSeason

12.09.2009 from	Note 3.12
(15,000 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption N/A

Tyre size and vehicle make
205 / 55 R15 V
BMW 320
Result: Would you buy again? Probably
Comment:
the P6 are mounted on the front, and i have michelin summer tyre on the rear wheel. the P6 is better than the michelin on wet condition, but worst under dry et hot condition. it's a good tyre for winter or rain.I have dont test the P6 under snow condition.

09.07.2009 from	Note 4.18
(64,000 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption N/A

Tyre size and vehicle make
235 / 40 R18 V
2007 VW Passat
Result: Would you buy again? Probably
Comment:
Good Tire all around. Wears ok but noisy as tread wears down

13.02.2006 from Garbo Tezel	Note 3.15
(60,000 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption N/A

Tyre size and vehicle make
195 / 60 R15 H
Volvo S40 1.6
Result: Would you buy again? Probably not
Comment:
In first 30.000km's, the tires were superb. But in the 2nd 30.000km's, the quality went bad dramatically. BTW, i can use the rear tires 5000km.s more. But i should have changed the front tires 10.000km.s before!

26.01.2004 from	Note 2.08
(60,000 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption N/A

Tyre size and vehicle make
215 / 45 R17 ZR
Saab 93 Aero
Result: Would you buy again? No way
Comment:
Fitted as standard on the car when new, it was not until I put a pair of Hankook Ventus 102 on the front that I really appreciated how these tyres struggled. Poor grip and poor wear coupled with greater road noise make these tyres a poor choice. Steer cle

‹

›